<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nathan's Blog &#187; mail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nathan.studiodifferent.com/tag/mail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nathan.studiodifferent.com</link>
	<description>Wired World Wonderings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 16:50:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Dusting Off the Gmail Account</title>
		<link>http://nathan.studiodifferent.com/2006/04/19/dusting-off-the-gmail-account/</link>
		<comments>http://nathan.studiodifferent.com/2006/04/19/dusting-off-the-gmail-account/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 07:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nathan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mail]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathan.studiodifferent.com/2006/04/19/dusting-off-the-gmail-account/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[


I&#8217;ve had a Gmail account since September 2004, when invitations were fewer and farther between, but I never saw much benefit to an additional web mail service. Hotmail was sufficient (predominantly via hotwayd). I was also skeptical about Gmail&#8217;s copious storage space and it&#8217;s marketing implications. But today, as I consider a new ISP and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
<img src="http://nathan.studiodifferent.com/wp-content/uploads/2006/04/gmail-logo.gif" width="143" height="59" alt=""/>
</div>
<p>I&#8217;ve had a Gmail account since September 2004, when invitations were fewer and farther between, but I never saw much benefit to an additional web mail service. Hotmail was sufficient (predominantly via <a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/hotwayd/">hotwayd</a>). I was also skeptical about Gmail&#8217;s copious storage space and it&#8217;s marketing implications. But today, as I consider a new ISP and primary email address, I see Gmail&#8217;s advantages vs. Hotmail.<span id="more-28"></span></p>
<h3>Universal Access: POP3 / SMTP</h3>
<p>Call me old-fasioned, but I like the option of using a traditional desktop client. Advantages include offline use, no ads, trained spam filters, and a choice of UI and feature set. Hotmail requires 3rd party software to enable use with traditional clients. Gmail, on the other hand, offers free SSL-secured POP3 and SMTP access. This means that you can use any client you want &#8211; Thunderbird, Outlook, Eudora, &#8230;. Gmail even allows you to choose between deleting or archiving items accessed with POP3. The former offers increased privacy while the latter allows you to retain web access.</p>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<img src="/wp-content/uploads/2006/04/gmail-protocols.jpg" width="500" height="273" alt="Protocol Configuration"/>
</div>
<h3>Organization: Tags, Conversations, Searching</h3>
<p>Where Hotmail offers only circa 1980 flat &#8220;Inbox&#8221; access, Gmail is <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web2.0">Web2.0</a>-compliant, replete with AJAX, tags, and &#8220;viral&#8221; invitation-only marketing. For the uninitiated, tags are arbitrary labels that can be applied to messages. One might label an e-mail both <em>political</em> and <em>humorous</em>, for instance. Gmail calls these &#8220;labels&#8221;, and this feature offers easy views to any category (e.g. all <em>humorous</em> e-mail, <em>registration</em> e-mail, etc).</p>
<p><em>Conversations</em> are Gmail&#8217;s term for threading, a feature that lists related e-mail on a single page, regardless of the date. This makes it easier to view a collection of related correspondence in it&#8217;s entirety.</p>
<p>Of course it&#8217;s no surprise that the Google service offers flexible searching and filtering. Available search and filtering features compete favorably with desktop clients.</p>
<p>Combined with over 2GB of archival storage, this unprecedented level of access is a compelling reason to archive e-mail on the server rather than deleting it.</p>
<h3>Bottom Line</h3>
<p>Even if you are satisfied with HotMail, or your ISP&#8217;s mail features, I recommend giving Gmail a try. Google&#8217;s approach is more accomodating than Microsoft&#8217;s HotMail, which offers less free storage, and does not provide convenient POP3/IMAP access. Gmail&#8217;s solid web interface, combined with the option to use a full client, have me hooked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nathan.studiodifferent.com/2006/04/19/dusting-off-the-gmail-account/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
